https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272493 Where a special statute prescribes its own limitation period for appeal and does not expressly exclude the Limitation Act, Section 29(2) imports Sections 3 to 24, including Section 5, so delay may be condoned on sufficient cause even before a statutory appellate authority. The analysis notes that the authority's non-court status does not prevent application of Section 5. It also stresses that bona fide prosecution of earlier proceedings, including time spent before the High Court before pursuing the alternative appellate remedy, must be considered in deciding condonation. On that basis, the delay was treated as liable to condonation and the appeal as fit to be restored for decision on merits. en-us Wed, 03 Mar 1982 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 05 May 2018 16:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272493 Where a special statute prescribes its own limitation period for appeal and does not expressly exclude the Limitation Act, Section 29(2) imports Sections 3 to 24, including Section 5, so delay may be condoned on sufficient cause even before a statutory appellate authority. The analysis notes that the authority's non-court status does not prevent application of Section 5. It also stresses that bona fide prosecution of earlier proceedings, including time spent before the High Court before pursuing the alternative appellate remedy, must be considered in deciding condonation. On that basis, the delay was treated as liable to condonation and the appeal as fit to be restored for decision on merits. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 03 Mar 1982 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272493