https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272491 Section 29(2) of the Limitation Act, 1963 applies where a special or local law prescribes its own limitation period different from the Schedule, and Sections 4 to 24 apply unless expressly excluded. On that basis, an application under Section 91 of the Punjab Land Revenue Act could be considered with Section 5 condonation, because the absence of a matching Schedule entry did not exclude the Limitation Act and the statute did not expressly bar its application. The benefit of delay condonation is not confined to civil courts and may extend to proceedings before a revenue authority or persona designata. The authority was therefore required to consider sufficient cause and could not decline jurisdiction on the mistaken view that it lacked power to entertain a delayed application. en-us Wed, 26 Mar 1980 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Sep 2022 15:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272491 Section 29(2) of the Limitation Act, 1963 applies where a special or local law prescribes its own limitation period different from the Schedule, and Sections 4 to 24 apply unless expressly excluded. On that basis, an application under Section 91 of the Punjab Land Revenue Act could be considered with Section 5 condonation, because the absence of a matching Schedule entry did not exclude the Limitation Act and the statute did not expressly bar its application. The benefit of delay condonation is not confined to civil courts and may extend to proceedings before a revenue authority or persona designata. The authority was therefore required to consider sufficient cause and could not decline jurisdiction on the mistaken view that it lacked power to entertain a delayed application. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 26 Mar 1980 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272491