<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules Reassessment Valid: Lack of Mention in Order Doesn&#039;t Mean Non-Consideration of Escaped Income.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=39269</link>
    <description>Reopening of assessment - reason to believe that income on account of EDC had escaped assessment - there would be no occasion for the petitioner to argue that merely because the said issue has not been discussed in the assessment order, it will not mean that it was not considered. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2018 14:07:50 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 May 2018 14:07:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=519298" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules Reassessment Valid: Lack of Mention in Order Doesn&#039;t Mean Non-Consideration of Escaped Income.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=39269</link>
      <description>Reopening of assessment - reason to believe that income on account of EDC had escaped assessment - there would be no occasion for the petitioner to argue that merely because the said issue has not been discussed in the assessment order, it will not mean that it was not considered. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2018 14:07:50 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=39269</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>