https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359891 The HC held that the petitioner did not exhibit any intention to evade tax despite Part-B of the e-way bill being incomplete regarding the vehicle number. The court found that the petitioner was not required to fill in all details, including the vehicle number, before loading the goods. Since all other documents accompanied the goods and contained necessary details, the mere omission of the vehicle number in Part-B did not justify seizure. Consequently, the seizure order was quashed, and the goods along with the vehicle were ordered to be released. The petition was allowed in favor of the appellant. en-us Fri, 13 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 Jul 2025 10:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359891 The HC held that the petitioner did not exhibit any intention to evade tax despite Part-B of the e-way bill being incomplete regarding the vehicle number. The court found that the petitioner was not required to fill in all details, including the vehicle number, before loading the goods. Since all other documents accompanied the goods and contained necessary details, the mere omission of the vehicle number in Part-B did not justify seizure. Consequently, the seizure order was quashed, and the goods along with the vehicle were ordered to be released. The petition was allowed in favor of the appellant. Case-Laws GST Fri, 13 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359891