<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 448 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359884</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, reducing the redemption fine and penalty imposed on the appellants. The decision emphasized the importance of considering factual circumstances and intentions behind the misclassification before imposing severe penalties, ultimately providing relief to the appellants based on the presented evidence and arguments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2020 14:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=519253" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 448 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359884</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, reducing the redemption fine and penalty imposed on the appellants. The decision emphasized the importance of considering factual circumstances and intentions behind the misclassification before imposing severe penalties, ultimately providing relief to the appellants based on the presented evidence and arguments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359884</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>