<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 438 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359874</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision, emphasizing that the depreciation claimed by the assessee was justified based on the use of vehicles for transportation services. The Court found no error in the ITAT&#039;s judgment and ruled that no substantial question of law was raised in the appeal. Consequently, the appeal challenging the order under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2009-10 was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 May 2018 08:43:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=519243" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 438 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359874</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision, emphasizing that the depreciation claimed by the assessee was justified based on the use of vehicles for transportation services. The Court found no error in the ITAT&#039;s judgment and ruled that no substantial question of law was raised in the appeal. Consequently, the appeal challenging the order under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2009-10 was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359874</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>