https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12913 A prosecution request to summon documents was sustained because the procedural power to require production of documents under the relevant Criminal Procedure Code provisions was not defeated by technical objection to the form of summons. The Court found no actual prejudice to the accused, since no prosecution witness had yet been cross-examined and the defence had not begun its case. It also noted that the prosecution should not build its case piecemeal, but the stage of proceedings did not justify interference. The revision was dismissed and the summons for production of documents was upheld. en-us Tue, 10 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 May 2009 10:20:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12913 A prosecution request to summon documents was sustained because the procedural power to require production of documents under the relevant Criminal Procedure Code provisions was not defeated by technical objection to the form of summons. The Court found no actual prejudice to the accused, since no prosecution witness had yet been cross-examined and the defence had not begun its case. It also noted that the prosecution should not build its case piecemeal, but the stage of proceedings did not justify interference. The revision was dismissed and the summons for production of documents was upheld. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 10 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12913