<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 423 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359859</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the penalty notice issued by the Assessing Officer to be legally unsustainable as it did not specify the exact charge under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. Consequently, the penalty imposed was cancelled, and the appeal filed by the Assessee was allowed. The Tribunal did not address the other grounds raised by the Assessee as they became moot following the cancellation of the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 May 2018 08:42:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=519228" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 423 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359859</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the penalty notice issued by the Assessing Officer to be legally unsustainable as it did not specify the exact charge under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. Consequently, the penalty imposed was cancelled, and the appeal filed by the Assessee was allowed. The Tribunal did not address the other grounds raised by the Assessee as they became moot following the cancellation of the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359859</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>