<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 418 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359854</link>
    <description>The AO&#039;s appeals were dismissed due to low tax effect for AY 2006-07. Disallowance of professional fees for non-deduction of TDS was reversed in favor of the assessee for AY 2006-07 and 2008-09. The addition based on AIR information and professional receipts for AY 2007-08 and 2008-09 was remanded for fresh adjudication. Disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) for payments to non-resident entities was reversed for being professional services. Interest payment calculation was directed as per Board Circular. Payments to retired partners were held as not taxable income. The Tribunal&#039;s decisions were based on precedents and detailed analysis of provisions, favoring the assessee in most issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 May 2018 11:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=519223" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 418 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359854</link>
      <description>The AO&#039;s appeals were dismissed due to low tax effect for AY 2006-07. Disallowance of professional fees for non-deduction of TDS was reversed in favor of the assessee for AY 2006-07 and 2008-09. The addition based on AIR information and professional receipts for AY 2007-08 and 2008-09 was remanded for fresh adjudication. Disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) for payments to non-resident entities was reversed for being professional services. Interest payment calculation was directed as per Board Circular. Payments to retired partners were held as not taxable income. The Tribunal&#039;s decisions were based on precedents and detailed analysis of provisions, favoring the assessee in most issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359854</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>