<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 413 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359849</link>
    <description>The High Court declined to interfere with the notices and summons issued by the Directorate General of Central Excise Intelligence, emphasizing limited judicial intervention at the summons stage. The Court highlighted that the petitioner could raise legal contentions but factual aspects would be examined by the authorities. The Court refrained from expressing any opinion on the case&#039;s merits, leaving all issues open for further consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 May 2018 08:41:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=519218" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 413 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359849</link>
      <description>The High Court declined to interfere with the notices and summons issued by the Directorate General of Central Excise Intelligence, emphasizing limited judicial intervention at the summons stage. The Court highlighted that the petitioner could raise legal contentions but factual aspects would be examined by the authorities. The Court refrained from expressing any opinion on the case&#039;s merits, leaving all issues open for further consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359849</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>