<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 410 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359846</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand and penalties imposed on the Appellant. It held that the sale of SIM cards by the Appellant was an independent transaction subject to VAT, not service tax. The Tribunal found that the Appellant&#039;s activities were distinct from the provision of telecommunication services, emphasizing the separate nature of marketing services for RCOM and the sale of SIM cards. The Tribunal also ruled that the extended period of limitation was not applicable as there was no evidence of tax evasion or suppression of facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2019 12:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=519215" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 410 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359846</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand and penalties imposed on the Appellant. It held that the sale of SIM cards by the Appellant was an independent transaction subject to VAT, not service tax. The Tribunal found that the Appellant&#039;s activities were distinct from the provision of telecommunication services, emphasizing the separate nature of marketing services for RCOM and the sale of SIM cards. The Tribunal also ruled that the extended period of limitation was not applicable as there was no evidence of tax evasion or suppression of facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359846</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>