<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (11) TMI 18 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12910</link>
    <description>Damages paid under section 14B of the Employees&#039; Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 for delayed provident fund contributions are deductible under section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 only to the extent they are compensatory. The real character of the impost, not the statutory label, governs deductibility, and a levy containing both penal and compensatory elements requires examination of the provident fund scheme and relevant facts before any allowance is granted. The Madras HC held that only the compensatory component, as determined by the Income-tax Officer, could be deducted, and the Tribunal erred in allowing the full amount without that enquiry.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 18:58:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51921" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (11) TMI 18 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12910</link>
      <description>Damages paid under section 14B of the Employees&#039; Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 for delayed provident fund contributions are deductible under section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 only to the extent they are compensatory. The real character of the impost, not the statutory label, governs deductibility, and a levy containing both penal and compensatory elements requires examination of the provident fund scheme and relevant facts before any allowance is granted. The Madras HC held that only the compensatory component, as determined by the Income-tax Officer, could be deducted, and the Tribunal erred in allowing the full amount without that enquiry.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12910</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>