<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 402 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359838</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that M/s. Xerox correctly discharged its service tax liability for labor portion of Maintenance and Repair Services and &#039;Business Support Service&#039;. Activities were classified as Works Contracts, not taxable pre-01.06.2007. Post that date, services did not fall under taxable Works Contract Service. Therefore, demands for service tax, interest, and penalties were set aside. The appeal by M/s. Xerox was allowed, and Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 May 2018 08:41:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=519207" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 402 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359838</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that M/s. Xerox correctly discharged its service tax liability for labor portion of Maintenance and Repair Services and &#039;Business Support Service&#039;. Activities were classified as Works Contracts, not taxable pre-01.06.2007. Post that date, services did not fall under taxable Works Contract Service. Therefore, demands for service tax, interest, and penalties were set aside. The appeal by M/s. Xerox was allowed, and Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359838</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>