https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359836 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)'s decisions on all three issues in the case. The relevant date for the limitation period for refund claims under Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 was deemed to be the date of receipt of foreign exchange. The eligible refund amount should not be reduced due to domestic service tax payments, and the admissibility of certain input services should be determined through proper adjudication before rejecting a refund claim. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal and disposed of the stay petition. en-us Tue, 20 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 Jan 2020 14:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359836 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)'s decisions on all three issues in the case. The relevant date for the limitation period for refund claims under Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 was deemed to be the date of receipt of foreign exchange. The eligible refund amount should not be reduced due to domestic service tax payments, and the admissibility of certain input services should be determined through proper adjudication before rejecting a refund claim. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal and disposed of the stay petition. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 20 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359836