<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 392 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359828</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the department&#039;s decision to disallow cenvat credit availed on imported Aluminium scrap cleared &#039;as such&#039; and resold by dealers to the appellant. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing that the credit availed was legitimate under the Cenvat Credit Rules. The interpretation of the definition of &#039;first stage dealer&#039; was pivotal in determining the appellant&#039;s eligibility for credit, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the department&#039;s demands and penalties. The Tribunal&#039;s analysis supported the appellant&#039;s position, resulting in the appeal being allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2018 16:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=519197" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 392 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359828</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the department&#039;s decision to disallow cenvat credit availed on imported Aluminium scrap cleared &#039;as such&#039; and resold by dealers to the appellant. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing that the credit availed was legitimate under the Cenvat Credit Rules. The interpretation of the definition of &#039;first stage dealer&#039; was pivotal in determining the appellant&#039;s eligibility for credit, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the department&#039;s demands and penalties. The Tribunal&#039;s analysis supported the appellant&#039;s position, resulting in the appeal being allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359828</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>