<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 374 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359810</link>
    <description>The Court granted relief to the petitioner by directing the Appellate Authority to decide on the stay petition within one month. Recovery actions were suspended until the stay petition was resolved and communicated to the petitioner, emphasizing an expedited disposal process. The judgment aimed to ensure fairness for the petitioner while considering the substantial amount involved and balancing the interests of both parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 May 2018 08:39:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=519179" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 374 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359810</link>
      <description>The Court granted relief to the petitioner by directing the Appellate Authority to decide on the stay petition within one month. Recovery actions were suspended until the stay petition was resolved and communicated to the petitioner, emphasizing an expedited disposal process. The judgment aimed to ensure fairness for the petitioner while considering the substantial amount involved and balancing the interests of both parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359810</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>