<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1939 (12) TMI 5 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272478</link>
    <description>A civil court may use its inherent jurisdiction to grant protective interim relief to preserve the subject-matter of litigation, even before a plaint is numbered and registered as a suit on an application to sue as a pauper. The procedural code is not exhaustive where urgent protection is needed to secure the ends of justice. The injunction was also justified on the materials filed, because the application and supporting affidavit disclosed a real risk to the property and disputed funds, while no written reply or contrary evidence was produced. The injunction order was therefore sustained, and the appeal failed with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 1939 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 May 2018 15:07:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=519140" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1939 (12) TMI 5 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272478</link>
      <description>A civil court may use its inherent jurisdiction to grant protective interim relief to preserve the subject-matter of litigation, even before a plaint is numbered and registered as a suit on an application to sue as a pauper. The procedural code is not exhaustive where urgent protection is needed to secure the ends of justice. The injunction was also justified on the materials filed, because the application and supporting affidavit disclosed a real risk to the property and disputed funds, while no written reply or contrary evidence was produced. The injunction order was therefore sustained, and the appeal failed with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 1939 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272478</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>