<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1965 (1) TMI 81 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272475</link>
    <description>Rectification of a company&#039;s share register requires the claimant to establish present legal entitlement to identified shares. Joint ownership recorded in the register, allotment records and succession materials was not displaced by a share certificate in one holder&#039;s sole name, and an alleged gift was ineffective without a duly executed and stamped transfer deed. Under the articles, a deceased joint holder&#039;s interest devolved on the surviving joint holder; a succession certificate could not override that arrangement or identify a separate estate interest. Section 155 could not be used to partition jointly held shares between competing claimants. Consequently, no rectification was available where the company had committed no actionable default.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 May 2018 14:48:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=519137" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1965 (1) TMI 81 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272475</link>
      <description>Rectification of a company&#039;s share register requires the claimant to establish present legal entitlement to identified shares. Joint ownership recorded in the register, allotment records and succession materials was not displaced by a share certificate in one holder&#039;s sole name, and an alleged gift was ineffective without a duly executed and stamped transfer deed. Under the articles, a deceased joint holder&#039;s interest devolved on the surviving joint holder; a succession certificate could not override that arrangement or identify a separate estate interest. Section 155 could not be used to partition jointly held shares between competing claimants. Consequently, no rectification was available where the company had committed no actionable default.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272475</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>