https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272473 A civil court may, in a proper case, grant a temporary injunction under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure even if Order 39 does not expressly provide the needed authority, because inherent jurisdiction is available where the Code is not exhaustive and justice so requires. On the facts, however, the restraint on withdrawal from the defendants' bank accounts was not justified: the materials showed that the land and building were prima facie available as assets and likely sufficient to satisfy any decree, so the apprehension of ineffective recovery did not sustain the injunction. The restraint order was therefore vacated. en-us Tue, 11 Dec 1951 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 May 2018 14:48:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272473 A civil court may, in a proper case, grant a temporary injunction under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure even if Order 39 does not expressly provide the needed authority, because inherent jurisdiction is available where the Code is not exhaustive and justice so requires. On the facts, however, the restraint on withdrawal from the defendants' bank accounts was not justified: the materials showed that the land and building were prima facie available as assets and likely sufficient to satisfy any decree, so the apprehension of ineffective recovery did not sustain the injunction. The restraint order was therefore vacated. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 11 Dec 1951 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272473