<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1951 (8) TMI 23 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272462</link>
    <description>A writ petition for certiorari was treated as keeping the underlying rent-control matter pending, so the remedial amendment under Section 20 of Madras Act VIII of 1951 applied to the dispute. The amended proviso to Section 7(2) of the Madras Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1949 protected a tenant where default in rent payment was not wilful and arrears had been cleared before hearing. On those facts, the tenant fell within the statutory protection and eviction could not be sustained; the eviction order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 1951 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 May 2018 11:10:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=519117" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1951 (8) TMI 23 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272462</link>
      <description>A writ petition for certiorari was treated as keeping the underlying rent-control matter pending, so the remedial amendment under Section 20 of Madras Act VIII of 1951 applied to the dispute. The amended proviso to Section 7(2) of the Madras Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1949 protected a tenant where default in rent payment was not wilful and arrears had been cleared before hearing. On those facts, the tenant fell within the statutory protection and eviction could not be sustained; the eviction order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 1951 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272462</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>