<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 1294 - ITAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272449</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was unjustified as the appellant&#039;s error in claiming depreciation was inadvertent. The appellant promptly rectified the mistake by adding the amount to the total income upon realization. Emphasizing the absence of any misrepresentation and citing relevant case law, the Tribunal concluded that inadvertent errors do not warrant penalties under the Act. Consequently, the penalty was deleted, and the appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 May 2018 08:52:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=519101" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 1294 - ITAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272449</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was unjustified as the appellant&#039;s error in claiming depreciation was inadvertent. The appellant promptly rectified the mistake by adding the amount to the total income upon realization. Emphasizing the absence of any misrepresentation and citing relevant case law, the Tribunal concluded that inadvertent errors do not warrant penalties under the Act. Consequently, the penalty was deleted, and the appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272449</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>