<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 366 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359802</link>
    <description>The newly constituted IT grievance redressal mechanism was treated as the appropriate first forum for complaints. Commissioners (CGST) were designated as Nodal Officers, and a public notice and circular were placed on record to operationalise the process. The petitioners were directed to submit brief representations to the concerned Nodal Officers, who or the Redressal Committee would deal with them in accordance with the circular.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 May 2018 08:52:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=519091" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 366 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359802</link>
      <description>The newly constituted IT grievance redressal mechanism was treated as the appropriate first forum for complaints. Commissioners (CGST) were designated as Nodal Officers, and a public notice and circular were placed on record to operationalise the process. The petitioners were directed to submit brief representations to the concerned Nodal Officers, who or the Redressal Committee would deal with them in accordance with the circular.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359802</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>