<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 365 - KERLA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359801</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petitions, finding no arbitrariness, illegality, malafides, or unfairness in the tender process. It concluded that there was no fundamental breach of tender conditions by the third respondent, and the evaluation by respondents 1 and 2 aligned with principles of fairness and transparency.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2025 10:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=519090" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 365 - KERLA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359801</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petitions, finding no arbitrariness, illegality, malafides, or unfairness in the tender process. It concluded that there was no fundamental breach of tender conditions by the third respondent, and the evaluation by respondents 1 and 2 aligned with principles of fairness and transparency.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359801</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>