<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 358 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359794</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals, ruling that the waiver of the loan did not constitute taxable income under Sections 28(iv) and 41(1) of the Income Tax Act. The waiver amount received in cash did not fall under Section 28(iv), which applies to non-monetary benefits. Additionally, as the waiver was not related to a trading liability and no deduction was claimed for the interest paid on the loan, Section 41(1) was deemed inapplicable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2018 10:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=519083" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 358 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359794</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals, ruling that the waiver of the loan did not constitute taxable income under Sections 28(iv) and 41(1) of the Income Tax Act. The waiver amount received in cash did not fall under Section 28(iv), which applies to non-monetary benefits. Additionally, as the waiver was not related to a trading liability and no deduction was claimed for the interest paid on the loan, Section 41(1) was deemed inapplicable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359794</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>