<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 351 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359787</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals. The decision was based on the overall consideration of facts and legal precedents, leading to the modification of the disallowance percentage for the alleged bogus purchases. The Tribunal upheld a 12.5% disallowance of the bogus purchases, differing from the lower authorities&#039; orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 May 2018 08:51:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=519076" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 351 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359787</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals. The decision was based on the overall consideration of facts and legal precedents, leading to the modification of the disallowance percentage for the alleged bogus purchases. The Tribunal upheld a 12.5% disallowance of the bogus purchases, differing from the lower authorities&#039; orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359787</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>