<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 341 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359777</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal related to the disallowance of TDS on octroi charges and the taxation of the Industrial Promotion Subsidy, treating the latter as a capital receipt. However, it dismissed the appeal regarding the amortization of share capital expenses, upholding the view that such expenses are capital in nature. Accordingly, the appeal for AY 2010-11 was partly allowed, and the appeal for AY 2011-12 was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 May 2018 17:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=519066" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 341 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359777</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal related to the disallowance of TDS on octroi charges and the taxation of the Industrial Promotion Subsidy, treating the latter as a capital receipt. However, it dismissed the appeal regarding the amortization of share capital expenses, upholding the view that such expenses are capital in nature. Accordingly, the appeal for AY 2010-11 was partly allowed, and the appeal for AY 2011-12 was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359777</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>