<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 330 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359766</link>
    <description>The tribunal vacated or modified the restraint orders against respondents where no prima facie evidence of involvement in the fraud was found. Emphasizing the importance of not burdening innocent individuals, the judgment aimed to balance investigation needs with respondents&#039; rights and livelihoods. The applications were disposed of with directions to vacate or modify the restraint orders accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 May 2018 18:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=519055" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 330 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359766</link>
      <description>The tribunal vacated or modified the restraint orders against respondents where no prima facie evidence of involvement in the fraud was found. Emphasizing the importance of not burdening innocent individuals, the judgment aimed to balance investigation needs with respondents&#039; rights and livelihoods. The applications were disposed of with directions to vacate or modify the restraint orders accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359766</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>