https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359762 International arbitration questions on the distinction between seat and venue, the determination of governing law and curial jurisdiction, and the competence of Indian courts to entertain Section 34 challenges are left unresolved in this order. The Court also noted issues concerning the effect of UNCITRAL Model Law references in the arbitration agreement and the continuing relevance of earlier precedents under repealed arbitration statutes. Finding conflicting authorities and substantial questions of law, it referred all such issues to a larger Bench under Order VI Rule 2 of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 and recorded no merits findings. en-us Tue, 01 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 May 2018 08:49:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359762 International arbitration questions on the distinction between seat and venue, the determination of governing law and curial jurisdiction, and the competence of Indian courts to entertain Section 34 challenges are left unresolved in this order. The Court also noted issues concerning the effect of UNCITRAL Model Law references in the arbitration agreement and the continuing relevance of earlier precedents under repealed arbitration statutes. Finding conflicting authorities and substantial questions of law, it referred all such issues to a larger Bench under Order VI Rule 2 of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 and recorded no merits findings. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 01 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359762