<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 312 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359748</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the matter to the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) for a detailed examination and specific findings on the denial of cenvat credit on input services used in output service, excisable goods manufacture, and trading activity. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of addressing all arguments raised by the appellant in tax-related cases, highlighting the need for a comprehensive and reasoned decision-making process to ensure a fair resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 May 2018 12:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=519037" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 312 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359748</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the matter to the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) for a detailed examination and specific findings on the denial of cenvat credit on input services used in output service, excisable goods manufacture, and trading activity. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of addressing all arguments raised by the appellant in tax-related cases, highlighting the need for a comprehensive and reasoned decision-making process to ensure a fair resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359748</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>