https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359744 The court dismissed the appeal filed against the penalty imposed under Section 11AC of The Central Excise Act, 1944, amounting to Rs. 8,47,131. The appellant's arguments regarding staff error in GAR-7 particulars and ER-1 return discrepancies were rejected. The court upheld the Tribunal's decision, emphasizing the absence of substantial legal questions and affirming the penalty under Section 11AC. The judgment concluded the legal proceedings, affirming the Tribunal's findings as the final fact-finding body in the case. en-us Mon, 02 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 May 2018 08:48:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359744 The court dismissed the appeal filed against the penalty imposed under Section 11AC of The Central Excise Act, 1944, amounting to Rs. 8,47,131. The appellant's arguments regarding staff error in GAR-7 particulars and ER-1 return discrepancies were rejected. The court upheld the Tribunal's decision, emphasizing the absence of substantial legal questions and affirming the penalty under Section 11AC. The judgment concluded the legal proceedings, affirming the Tribunal's findings as the final fact-finding body in the case. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 02 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359744