<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 304 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359740</link>
    <description>The appellant, engaged in manufacturing steering parts, availed cenvat credit on service tax paid on Architectural Services and Land Development Charges. The disallowance of credit on Land Development Charges was overturned as the appellant provided evidence that the charges were inclusive of service tax. The matter was remanded for determining the specific amount of service tax related to Land Development Charges. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the impugned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 May 2018 12:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=519029" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 304 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359740</link>
      <description>The appellant, engaged in manufacturing steering parts, availed cenvat credit on service tax paid on Architectural Services and Land Development Charges. The disallowance of credit on Land Development Charges was overturned as the appellant provided evidence that the charges were inclusive of service tax. The matter was remanded for determining the specific amount of service tax related to Land Development Charges. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the impugned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359740</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>