<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 302 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359738</link>
    <description>Service tax credit was admissible on manpower recruitment services used to engage an assistant pharmacist, because the appointment had an integral nexus with the factory&#039;s statutory obligation to provide first-aid treatment and necessary medical facilities under the Factories Act. Credit on insurance services required factual verification: for the relevant period, it could be claimed only to the extent the policy covered factory employees, and the record needed examination on whether family members or employees of other units were also covered. The manpower recruitment credit was allowed, while the insurance-credit issue was remanded for fresh consideration on the actual scope of coverage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 May 2018 14:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=519027" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 302 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359738</link>
      <description>Service tax credit was admissible on manpower recruitment services used to engage an assistant pharmacist, because the appointment had an integral nexus with the factory&#039;s statutory obligation to provide first-aid treatment and necessary medical facilities under the Factories Act. Credit on insurance services required factual verification: for the relevant period, it could be claimed only to the extent the policy covered factory employees, and the record needed examination on whether family members or employees of other units were also covered. The manpower recruitment credit was allowed, while the insurance-credit issue was remanded for fresh consideration on the actual scope of coverage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359738</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>