<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 299 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359735</link>
    <description>Extended limitation could not be invoked for denial of SSI exemption where the declaration had been filed and the department was already aware of the relevant clearances, so the first appeal succeeded on limitation. Eligibility under Notification No. 8/2003-CE also turned on whether traded goods had to be excluded from aggregate clearances; because that factual position had not been examined below, the matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for verification of the traded-goods component and a fresh decision on exemption eligibility.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 May 2018 08:48:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=519024" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 299 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359735</link>
      <description>Extended limitation could not be invoked for denial of SSI exemption where the declaration had been filed and the department was already aware of the relevant clearances, so the first appeal succeeded on limitation. Eligibility under Notification No. 8/2003-CE also turned on whether traded goods had to be excluded from aggregate clearances; because that factual position had not been examined below, the matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for verification of the traded-goods component and a fresh decision on exemption eligibility.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359735</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>