<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 294 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359730</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty and interest payment confirmation, as the appellants admitted liability and faced financial difficulties without fraudulent intent. The penalty under Rule 25 read with Section 11AC was reduced to Rs. 5000 per default, aligning with previous Tribunal decisions and Gujarat High Court rulings, emphasizing penalties should not exceed this amount for delayed duty payment due to financial crisis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 May 2018 08:47:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=519019" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 294 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359730</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty and interest payment confirmation, as the appellants admitted liability and faced financial difficulties without fraudulent intent. The penalty under Rule 25 read with Section 11AC was reduced to Rs. 5000 per default, aligning with previous Tribunal decisions and Gujarat High Court rulings, emphasizing penalties should not exceed this amount for delayed duty payment due to financial crisis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359730</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>