<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 292 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359728</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed by way of remand, emphasizing the need for verification of the claimed credit amount of &amp;amp;8377; 85,734/- for the period April 2014 to August 2014. The judgment underscored the significance of proper scrutiny of documents and evidence in assessing the admissibility of credit amounts related to CENVAT credit of service tax paid on Out Door Catering Service (Canteen Service) during the specified period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 May 2018 08:47:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=519017" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 292 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359728</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed by way of remand, emphasizing the need for verification of the claimed credit amount of &amp;amp;8377; 85,734/- for the period April 2014 to August 2014. The judgment underscored the significance of proper scrutiny of documents and evidence in assessing the admissibility of credit amounts related to CENVAT credit of service tax paid on Out Door Catering Service (Canteen Service) during the specified period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359728</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>