https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359723 POY was treated as covered by the exemption for PFY under Notification No. 12/2012-CE, following the Tribunal's earlier view on similar facts, and the demand of duty on POY had already been set aside on that basis. The remaining dispute concerned duty on waste of POY and PSF, which required reconsideration in light of the earlier Tribunal observations and Notification No. 89/95-CE. The matter was therefore remanded to the adjudicating authority for fresh decision in accordance with those directions. en-us Wed, 14 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 May 2018 08:47:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359723 POY was treated as covered by the exemption for PFY under Notification No. 12/2012-CE, following the Tribunal's earlier view on similar facts, and the demand of duty on POY had already been set aside on that basis. The remaining dispute concerned duty on waste of POY and PSF, which required reconsideration in light of the earlier Tribunal observations and Notification No. 89/95-CE. The matter was therefore remanded to the adjudicating authority for fresh decision in accordance with those directions. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 14 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359723