https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359720 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding the demand of duty on grounds of clandestine removal of goods unsustainable. The Tribunal emphasized that payments made by M/s Kiritida Silk Mills constituted discharge of duty liability, leading to the dismissal of the demand, interest, and penalties. Additionally, the penalty imposed on M/s Kiritida Silk Mills was set aside due to lack of reasoning supporting its sustainability under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The judgment was pronounced on 13.02.2018. en-us Tue, 13 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Feb 2019 11:38:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359720 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding the demand of duty on grounds of clandestine removal of goods unsustainable. The Tribunal emphasized that payments made by M/s Kiritida Silk Mills constituted discharge of duty liability, leading to the dismissal of the demand, interest, and penalties. Additionally, the penalty imposed on M/s Kiritida Silk Mills was set aside due to lack of reasoning supporting its sustainability under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The judgment was pronounced on 13.02.2018. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 13 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359720