<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 277 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359713</link>
    <description>The revenue&#039;s appeal against the CIT(A)&#039;s order for AY 2010-11, challenging the accounting method and tax deferment, was dismissed by the ITAT. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, citing a previous Tribunal order and a Supreme Court decision, determining the total loss for the assessee at ?(-)9,79,91,325. The adjustment made by the AO was deemed unwarranted, and the revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, rendering the assessee&#039;s cross objections infructuous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 May 2018 08:46:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=519002" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 277 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359713</link>
      <description>The revenue&#039;s appeal against the CIT(A)&#039;s order for AY 2010-11, challenging the accounting method and tax deferment, was dismissed by the ITAT. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, citing a previous Tribunal order and a Supreme Court decision, determining the total loss for the assessee at ?(-)9,79,91,325. The adjustment made by the AO was deemed unwarranted, and the revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, rendering the assessee&#039;s cross objections infructuous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359713</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>