https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272446 Constructions that broke open the roof, added a window for access, installed a water tank and condenser, enclosed the roof and laid pipes through it were treated as material alterations under Section 3(c) of the U.P. (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1947. The absence of written landlord permission remained legally significant, and the year of construction did not change the character of the alterations. The right to eject a tenant for such material alteration was held to attach to the property, so it passed to the transferee landlord under Section 109 of the Transfer of Property Act. Acquiescence and estoppel did not defeat the statutory requirement of written permission. en-us Mon, 21 May 1973 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Apr 2023 13:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272446 Constructions that broke open the roof, added a window for access, installed a water tank and condenser, enclosed the roof and laid pipes through it were treated as material alterations under Section 3(c) of the U.P. (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1947. The absence of written landlord permission remained legally significant, and the year of construction did not change the character of the alterations. The right to eject a tenant for such material alteration was held to attach to the property, so it passed to the transferee landlord under Section 109 of the Transfer of Property Act. Acquiescence and estoppel did not defeat the statutory requirement of written permission. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 21 May 1973 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272446