https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272440 Section 2(1)(d) of the U.P. Urban Area Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1956 was read in light of the Act's agrarian reform scheme and confined to land used for agriculture or horticulture, preserving Article 31A protection for that restricted class. The broader definition could not be applied to land wholly outside the cultivation-based framework used by the surrounding provisions. On the land-character issue, the record did not conclusively establish that the disputed plot was agricultural area or grove land; the material was insufficient to sustain vesting without a fresh determination under the statutory provisions, and the Section 8 notification and abatement orders were therefore set aside for reconsideration. en-us Wed, 28 Mar 1973 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 May 2018 14:37:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272440 Section 2(1)(d) of the U.P. Urban Area Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1956 was read in light of the Act's agrarian reform scheme and confined to land used for agriculture or horticulture, preserving Article 31A protection for that restricted class. The broader definition could not be applied to land wholly outside the cultivation-based framework used by the surrounding provisions. On the land-character issue, the record did not conclusively establish that the disputed plot was agricultural area or grove land; the material was insufficient to sustain vesting without a fresh determination under the statutory provisions, and the Section 8 notification and abatement orders were therefore set aside for reconsideration. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 28 Mar 1973 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272440