https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272436 The court held that the plaintiff was not liable to contribute to the marriage expenses of daughters married after the suit or to be married, based on the precedent set in a previous case. Future marriage expenses of unmarried daughters were capped at a maximum limit, with the plaintiff required to cover one-third of these expenses. The obligation to contribute to marriage expenses was deemed to continue even after partition, binding all family members. The court emphasized that this obligation stems from joint family property law, not solely from parental duty. en-us Thu, 20 Dec 1928 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 May 2018 12:40:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272436 The court held that the plaintiff was not liable to contribute to the marriage expenses of daughters married after the suit or to be married, based on the precedent set in a previous case. Future marriage expenses of unmarried daughters were capped at a maximum limit, with the plaintiff required to cover one-third of these expenses. The obligation to contribute to marriage expenses was deemed to continue even after partition, binding all family members. The court emphasized that this obligation stems from joint family property law, not solely from parental duty. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 20 Dec 1928 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272436