<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 269 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359705</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the classification of imported goods under the Customs Tariff heading. The goods were correctly declared as heavy melting scrap, not misdeclared or secondhand goods. The Tribunal found the value enhancement by the Revenue arbitrary and unjustified, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal due to serious infirmities in the decision-making process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2018 11:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518937" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 269 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359705</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the classification of imported goods under the Customs Tariff heading. The goods were correctly declared as heavy melting scrap, not misdeclared or secondhand goods. The Tribunal found the value enhancement by the Revenue arbitrary and unjustified, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal due to serious infirmities in the decision-making process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359705</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>