<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 265 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359701</link>
    <description>The SC held that where arm&#039;s length principle has been satisfied in tax assessments, no additional profit can be attributed to a person despite having a permanent establishment in India. The court relied on its previous decision in Assistant Director of Income Tax-I v. E-Funds IT Solution Inc., establishing that compliance with arm&#039;s length pricing procedures precludes further profit attribution. The reassessment notice issued solely on grounds of permanent establishment in India was deemed unsustainable when arm&#039;s length price procedure had already been followed. The appeals were allowed, confirming that proper adherence to arm&#039;s length principles provides complete protection against additional profit attribution claims based merely on permanent establishment existence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 15:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518933" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 265 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359701</link>
      <description>The SC held that where arm&#039;s length principle has been satisfied in tax assessments, no additional profit can be attributed to a person despite having a permanent establishment in India. The court relied on its previous decision in Assistant Director of Income Tax-I v. E-Funds IT Solution Inc., establishing that compliance with arm&#039;s length pricing procedures precludes further profit attribution. The reassessment notice issued solely on grounds of permanent establishment in India was deemed unsustainable when arm&#039;s length price procedure had already been followed. The appeals were allowed, confirming that proper adherence to arm&#039;s length principles provides complete protection against additional profit attribution claims based merely on permanent establishment existence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359701</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>