https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359699 The court allowed the writ petition, quashing the order dated 19.07.2017, and directed the respondents to release the seized jewelry to petitioner No.1 within two weeks. The court found that the seizure and the refusal to release the jewelry were not justified based on the evidence and legal principles presented. en-us Fri, 27 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 May 2018 06:36:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359699 The court allowed the writ petition, quashing the order dated 19.07.2017, and directed the respondents to release the seized jewelry to petitioner No.1 within two weeks. The court found that the seizure and the refusal to release the jewelry were not justified based on the evidence and legal principles presented. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 27 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359699