<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 262 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359698</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, ruling that no substantial question of law arose in the issues raised by the Revenue regarding transfer pricing adjustment methods and the inclusion of comparable companies. The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions based on factual findings, concluding that the issues were settled by previous court decisions and did not warrant further consideration. No costs were awarded in the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 May 2018 06:36:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518930" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 262 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359698</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, ruling that no substantial question of law arose in the issues raised by the Revenue regarding transfer pricing adjustment methods and the inclusion of comparable companies. The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions based on factual findings, concluding that the issues were settled by previous court decisions and did not warrant further consideration. No costs were awarded in the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359698</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>