<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 224 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359660</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court found the second writ petition maintainable as the challenge to a subsequent order was not considered by the High Court. The Court set aside the High Court&#039;s decision and directed a review of the second writ petition on its merits, clarifying it did not assess the case&#039;s substance. The appellant was instructed to serve the judgment to respondents, and the appeal was resolved with no costs awarded, concluding the matter without further legal action.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2018 11:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518892" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 224 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359660</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court found the second writ petition maintainable as the challenge to a subsequent order was not considered by the High Court. The Court set aside the High Court&#039;s decision and directed a review of the second writ petition on its merits, clarifying it did not assess the case&#039;s substance. The appellant was instructed to serve the judgment to respondents, and the appeal was resolved with no costs awarded, concluding the matter without further legal action.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359660</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>