<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 214 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359650</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the determination of the taxable value of services provided by the appellant but set aside the penalty imposed under Section 76, aligning with the legal precedent established by the Gujarat High Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 May 2018 12:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518882" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 214 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359650</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the determination of the taxable value of services provided by the appellant but set aside the penalty imposed under Section 76, aligning with the legal precedent established by the Gujarat High Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359650</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>