<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 213 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359649</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the validity of a circular allowing matters to be placed in a &quot;call book&quot; when challenging High Court judgments before the Supreme Court. The court directed the authorities to adjudicate a show cause notice for 37 services not directly impacted by the challenged judgments, emphasizing the need for separate consideration of each service. The decision on the circular&#039;s validity was deferred, and the petition regarding three specific services was adjourned for separate consideration. The petitioner agreed not to contest any appeal related to these three services based on tax effect considerations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2018 12:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518881" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 213 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359649</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the validity of a circular allowing matters to be placed in a &quot;call book&quot; when challenging High Court judgments before the Supreme Court. The court directed the authorities to adjudicate a show cause notice for 37 services not directly impacted by the challenged judgments, emphasizing the need for separate consideration of each service. The decision on the circular&#039;s validity was deferred, and the petition regarding three specific services was adjourned for separate consideration. The petitioner agreed not to contest any appeal related to these three services based on tax effect considerations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359649</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>