<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 212 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359648</link>
    <description>Outdoor catering services used in a factory canteen were treated as input service under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 because canteen facilities were a statutory requirement under the Factories Act and were indispensable to running the manufacturing premises. The court read the definition of input service broadly to cover services used directly or indirectly in relation to manufacture, and held that rule 3 did not restrict credit merely because the service was not used in the manufacturing process itself. Following the earlier decision on the same issue, service tax paid on the catering service was held to relate to business and manufacture, and CENVAT credit was admissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2018 12:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518880" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 212 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359648</link>
      <description>Outdoor catering services used in a factory canteen were treated as input service under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 because canteen facilities were a statutory requirement under the Factories Act and were indispensable to running the manufacturing premises. The court read the definition of input service broadly to cover services used directly or indirectly in relation to manufacture, and held that rule 3 did not restrict credit merely because the service was not used in the manufacturing process itself. Following the earlier decision on the same issue, service tax paid on the catering service was held to relate to business and manufacture, and CENVAT credit was admissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359648</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>