https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359647 The court dismissed the appeal challenging the condition imposed by the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) for the grant of stay. The appellant failed to comply with the additional deposit requirement set by the Tribunal, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. The court emphasized the discretionary nature of such orders and the importance of factual findings in determining liabilities. The judgment underscores the significance of adhering to statutory requirements in taxation matters and the consequences of non-compliance. Compliance with Tribunal conditions was mandated by the court by a specified deadline. en-us Mon, 28 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 27 Jun 2018 12:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359647 The court dismissed the appeal challenging the condition imposed by the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) for the grant of stay. The appellant failed to comply with the additional deposit requirement set by the Tribunal, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. The court emphasized the discretionary nature of such orders and the importance of factual findings in determining liabilities. The judgment underscores the significance of adhering to statutory requirements in taxation matters and the consequences of non-compliance. Compliance with Tribunal conditions was mandated by the court by a specified deadline. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 28 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359647